To be honest, as one with a decent training in statistics and operational research, I find the whole method a bit weird.
You shouldn’t need to ask expert about predicates that logically derive from the declared goal of granting the four freedoms.
I’d really like to read the reasoning of those who did “vote” for training data availability as “not required” to study and modify, because, for example, I really can’t imagine an effective way to study the behavior of any AI system (not only a ANN-based one) without the training data. Even just identifying over-fitting around certain clusters would be impossible without the actual data.
And this is another issue with the method: who selected the experts? according to which criteria? who decided the criteria?
For example, I wonder why Llama experts were included since Llama is not open source and Mark Zuckerberg publicly try to open wash it anyway.
Well I’d argue that an AI system trained on people’s (please, do not reduce them to “users”) data that cannot be distributed and are not available to the public, cannot match any open source AI definition.