If my votes for making training data required for exercising the freedom of study and modify made things worse for those outcomes than me not voting or voting something else (I’m taking your word for it, as I didn’t have time to check how you came to that conclusion), then I agree the chosen voting system was nonsense.
I still think the voting discussion is mostly a distraction.
But I’d appreciate it if OSI would not claim that the resulting decision on this important point is based on working group consensus, because I don’t think there ever was one. I had already argued this point in the past. Your voting analysis, if correct, would just strengthen my preexisting belief on the matter.