We heard you: let's focus on substantive discussion

The current OSAID defines an Open Source AI system as one where the four freedoms (Use, Study, Modify, Share) are recognized, and a skilled person would be able to recreate a substantially equivalent system. If Meta only provides incomplete information, then at least many of the collaborators with OSI would likely determine that it does not comply with OSAID. Also, if OSAID is incomplete, we can simply make revisions. The OSD was released as OSD 1.0 in February 1998, but it took several years until version 1.9 was released, and only then did it reach a stable state.

Hmm…, we seem to be having the same exchange again. The discussion on datasets, including myself, seems to be getting ahead of itself.

However, I believe that Samj-san’s point regarding the voting in the working group should be revisited separately. This is something that affects the credibility of OSAID.