Proposal to achieve consensus for the 1.0 release

[stefano]

@grugnog

if we want to have a meaningful Open Source AI definition it needs to include open training data. Yes, this might mean that models that inherently rely on private data can’t be “Open Source AI”, but they can still have open source data information and code, which are the primary artifacts that has value to others.

this seems to be the crux of the matter, thanks for clarifying that. You can live with such compromise (no Open Source AI trained on private data), while the OSI today and in the past hasn’t accepted to limit Open Source (or free software, however you want to call it) to few fields of use. Let’s agree to disagree.

There is a new version of the FAQ to cover this point:

Answers to frequently asked questions - HackMD

We can close this thread.