# Open Source AI needs to require data to be viable **URL:** \ **Category:** Open Source AI\ **Created:** [May 19, 2024, 6:03pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351 "2024-05-19T18:03:48Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 32
**Author:** ![nick](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/nick/32/542_2.png) [@nick](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/nick)\ **Post date:** [June 6, 2024, 5:02pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351/32 "2024-06-06T17:02:39Z")
I think we can all agree that Falcon, Llama, and Mistral do not meet the OSAID requirements, and this has been highlighted by the analysis from the Working Groups being led by Mer: > [@Initial Report on Definition Validation](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/initial-report-on-definition-validation/368/9): > > Thanks to @nick for pointing us to the [opening-up-chatgpt.github.io](http://opening-up-chatgpt.github.io) LLM openness list. Based on this information, we are now categorizing Mistral (Mixtral 8x7B) as not in alignment with the OSAID because its data pre-processing code is not released under an OSI-approved license. Again, if we are missing information on this or other systems, please let us know. Now OLMO is an interesting case because they recently made a change to the Dolma dataset license and made a huge deal about it: > **[Making a switch — Dolma moves to ODC-BY](https://blog.allenai.org/making-a-switch-dolma-moves-to-odc-by-8f0e73852f44)** > > We’re moving the Dolma dataset to the ODC-BY license. Here’s why. Dolma was under the [ImpACT](https://allenai.org/impact-license) license and now is using [ODC-By](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1-0/). It’s likely that OLMO does meet the OSAID requirements. --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351)._