# Open Source AI needs to require data to be viable

**URL:** <https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351>\
**Category:** Open Source AI\
**Created:** [May 19, 2024, 6:03pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351 "2024-05-19T18:03:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/mark/32/177_2.png) [@Mark](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/Mark)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2024, 7:08pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351/14 "2024-05-31T19:08:38Z")

</div>

@moodler writes:

> I am liking this idea of having two or three clearly-defined levels of openness it might be practical for the reality of very large and evolving data sets …

Specifically in response to this, let me point out that in the aforementioned paper we work out a few non-mutually exclusive ways of turning fine-grained data on openness into more categorical judgements (and we point out the risks of relying on the most reductive approach of all, a hard binary judgement):

 ![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/opensource2/original/1X/38ab085a6301f8eb37c36288edfc219e6dc40c3e.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/open-source-ai-needs-to-require-data-to-be-viable/351)._