# Moving the Checklist to v1.0, MOF and Mozilla' Framework

**URL:** <https://discuss.opensource.org/t/moving-the-checklist-to-v1-0-mof-and-mozilla-framework/677>\
**Category:** Open Source AI\
**Created:** [October 15, 2024, 9:30am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/moving-the-checklist-to-v1-0-mof-and-mozilla-framework/677 "2024-10-15T09:30:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gvlx](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/gvlx/32/381_2.png) [@gvlx](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/gvlx)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2024, 4:43pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/moving-the-checklist-to-v1-0-mof-and-mozilla-framework/677/4 "2024-10-17T16:43:41Z")

</div>

Hi,

To make this as simple as possible, we should have more than a guide, a tool to orient the system’s proponents in their certification.

I [proposed](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/proposal-to-achieve-consensus-for-the-1-0-release/653/9) we could adapt existing tools to our purpose.

The [MOT](https://isitopen.ai/) and [FMTI](https://crfm.stanford.edu/fmti/May-2024/index.html) could form a base for a process of certification, where the decision rules are given by the checklist (existing and future).

As for the process itself, I have to think about it and I’ll write down a proposal.

_Answer me this, please_: the actors of the validation process are the vendor/project submitting the Ai system and filling the required information, the validation system (described above), independent auditor(s) validating the input and outputs of the validation. Did I miss someone or something?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/moving-the-checklist-to-v1-0-mof-and-mozilla-framework/677)._