# Malicious compliance with the release candidate Open Source AI definition

**URL:** <https://discuss.opensource.org/t/malicious-compliance-with-the-release-candidate-open-source-ai-definition/642>\
**Category:** Open Source AI\
**Created:** [October 6, 2024, 7:46pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/malicious-compliance-with-the-release-candidate-open-source-ai-definition/642 "2024-10-06T19:46:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/mark/32/177_2.png) [@Mark](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/Mark)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2024, 8:33pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/malicious-compliance-with-the-release-candidate-open-source-ai-definition/642/2 "2024-10-06T20:33:06Z")

</div>

Very interesting exercise. To strengthen the case, Meta could claim that the [RedPajama project](https://huggingface.co/datasets/togethercomputer/RedPajama-Data-V2) shows that a ‘sufficiently skilled individual’ (or team I suppose) can indeed create something similar, demonstrating that the minimal requirements for data information are indeed met.

Birhane et al [2023](https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/42f225509e8263e2043c9d834ccd9a2b-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html) have a neat term for this form of selective reporting BTW: tactical non-declaration of data.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/malicious-compliance-with-the-release-candidate-open-source-ai-definition/642)._