# Is the definition of "AI system" by the OECD too broad?

**URL:** <https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-definition-of-ai-system-by-the-oecd-too-broad/156>\
**Category:** Open Source AI\
**Tags:** draft\
**Created:** [January 29, 2024, 11:19am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-definition-of-ai-system-by-the-oecd-too-broad/156 "2024-01-29T11:19:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stefano](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/stefano/32/4_2.png) [@stefano](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/stefano)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2024, 10:49am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-definition-of-ai-system-by-the-oecd-too-broad/156/10 "2024-02-14T10:49:01Z")

</div>

I moved some of the posts in this thread to the [Training data access](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/training-data-access/152) thread where they’re more appropriate.

Thanks @jplorre, that’s an interesting approach, I’d be open to use the same wording. I’d love to hear more suggestions. @fontana have you seen more precise definitions of AI systems that we should use instead?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-definition-of-ai-system-by-the-oecd-too-broad/156)._