Julia Ferraioli-san has published a blog post regarding OSAID, and it would be better to discuss in this forum thread. Even for someone like me, who struggles with English and often has to rely on translation engines, her arguments were clear and easy to understand.
Among the points Julia-san raises, questioning the significance of defining open-source AI, criticizing the use of vague terms like “skilled person,” and debating the appropriateness of using the OECD definition are issues that have already been discussed in this forum. These are important issues to recognize but not unsolvable problems.
However, the issue of whether datasets should be mandatory or not might need more careful discussion. I was a bit disappointed by her words at the end of the article that seemed to give up on legal feasibility, but her argument in the middle of the article that the four freedoms cannot be exercised resonates with what many people feel.
At this point, I believe that a “complete dataset” is not always necessary, and maintaining the completeness of a dataset is extremely difficult. Therefore, I find the current list of mandatory components to be reasonable. However, I am not actively welcoming the removal of the requirement for datasets. The general public will likely demand freedom for datasets as well. We must gather enough materials to convince them.
Therefore, I hope that more experiments like the following thread will be conducted.