I have been a Debian user since 1998, and for the past 25 years, I have always had several Debian developers around me. I am pleased to see Debian affiliates here as well.
The claim that training data for machine learning models is the preferred form of modification has recently been asserted by several industry figures, although it may have existed before. However, I personally feel that these claims do not adequately explain why training data is essential. While it is undoubtedly a preferred form, I am unsure if it is the most preferred.
Additionally, OSI is not an organization that determines the recommended form of modification. OSI has learned from the experience accumulated within the open-source community, including Debian. Therefore, OSAID will learn from the experience of the machine learning community, and at this point, it seems we have no choice but to have a flexible and ambiguous definition.