# A new draft of the Open Source AI Definition: v.0.0.5 is available for comments

**URL:** <https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174>\
**Category:** Open Source AI\
**Tags:** draft\
**Created:** [January 30, 2024, 4:57pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174 "2024-01-30T16:57:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stefano](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/stefano/32/4_2.png) [@stefano](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/stefano)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2024, 4:57pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/1 "2024-01-30T16:57:16Z")

</div>

A new draft is now available for comments. This is the first release to contain a very early draft of the “checklist”. It’s based on the Model Openness Framework being developed by LF AI & Data/Generative AI Commons.

There were a few unresolved comments on draft 0.0.4 for which I opened separate threads. See

- [Do we need to mention the level of autonomy of AI systems?](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/do-we-need-to-mention-the-level-of-autonomy-of-ai-systems/157/)
- [Is the verb "Use" clear enough?](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-verb-use-clear-enough/160/)
- [Is the definition of "AI system" by the OECD too broad?](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/is-the-definition-of-ai-system-by-the-oecd-too-broad/156/)
- [Does the "Share" verb need clarification?](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/does-the-share-verb-need-clarification/172)
- [Clarifications needed on the Out of scope section in draft 0.0.4](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/clarifications-needed-on-the-out-of-scope-section-in-draft-0-0-4/173)

## Changelog:

- Added the first draft of the checklist, based on the ongoing Track 1 exercise.
- Refactored lightly the Out of scope paragraph for clarity. More discussion needed.
- Left untouched other the preamble as more discussion is needed. More discussion needed.
- Left untouched the “Share” freedom. More discussion needed.

> **[The Open Source AI Definition v.0.0.5 - HackMD](https://hackmd.io/@opensourceinitiative/osaid-0-0-5)**
>
> Note: This document is made of three parts: A preamble, stating the intentions of this document; the Definition of Open Source AI itself; and a checklist to evaluate licenses.

​

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stefano](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/stefano/32/4_2.png) [@stefano](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/stefano)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2024, 1:43pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/2 "2024-01-31T13:43:28Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lumin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ce73a5/32.png) [@lumin](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/lumin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2024, 4:08am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/3 "2024-02-18T04:08:30Z")

</div>

Is it possible to pin this to the top of the forum?

Sometimes the older 0.0.4 version is ranked ahead of the latest 0.0.5 version. It might mislead our new audiences to older versions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lumin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ce73a5/32.png) [@lumin](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/lumin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2024, 4:10am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/4 "2024-02-18T04:10:40Z")

</div>

> [@lumin](#):
>
> Is it possible to pin this to the top of the forum?

I see the post is pinned. But it does not appear at the top – don’t know why.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mer](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/mer/32/102_2.png) [@Mer](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/Mer)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2024, 11:26pm UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/5 "2024-02-19T23:26:19Z")

</div>

Here’s the [link](https://hackmd.io/@opensourceinitiative/osaid-0-0-5) to v. 0.0.5 written out, rather than embedded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stefano](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/stefano/32/4_2.png) [@stefano](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/stefano)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2024, 10:19am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/6 "2024-02-20T10:19:12Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stefano](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/discuss.opensource.org/stefano/32/4_2.png) [@stefano](https://discuss.opensource.org/u/stefano)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2024, 11:06am UTC](https://discuss.opensource.org/t/a-new-draft-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-v-0-0-5-is-available-for-comments/174/7 "2024-03-11T11:06:14Z")

</div>


